Why a disclosed amount is a range and never a number

A periodic transaction report does not contain a dollar amount. It contains a checkbox. Every figure written about congressional trading profits is estimated from that checkbox — the question is whether the estimate is labelled as one.

By the Trade Record deskReviewed 6 min read2 sources

The ladder

Ten brackets, from $1,001 at the bottom to an open-ended top rung. A filer ticks one. The table below is read from the same database the rest of this site uses, so it cannot drift from what our pages actually enforce. The third column is the size of the guess any estimate built on that rung is making.

The ten STOCK Act disclosure amount brackets
#Bracket as filedWidth of the uncertainty
1$1,001 – $15,000$14,000
2$15,001 – $50,000$35,000
3$50,001 – $100,000$50,000
4$100,001 – $250,000$150,000
5$250,001 – $500,000$250,000
6$500,001 – $1,000,000$500,000
7$1,000,001 – $5,000,000$4,000,000
8$5,000,001 – $25,000,000$20,000,000
9$25,000,001 – $50,000,000$25,000,000
10Over $50,000,000unbounded

What the midpoint costs

Because the filing has no figure in it, every dollar amount you have ever read about congressional trading — including on this site — was estimated from these brackets. The standard method, and ours, is the midpoint: a "$1,001 – $15,000" trade is treated as $8,000.

That is a real estimate with a knowable error. Take "$1,000,001 – $5,000,000". The midpoint is $3 million and the true value is anywhere across a $4 million span, so a single trade can be wrong by roughly two thirds from bracket width alone — before any question of what the shares did afterwards. The "width of the uncertainty" column above is that error, per rung.

The full method, with a worked example, is in [the estimated values guide] — and every figure on the site links to it.

Sources

Keep reading

General information about a public disclosure law. Not legal advice, not investment advice, and not affiliated with any government body.